Despite the federal government managing to quell unrest in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) by meeting protester demands, similar tensions are brewing in Gilgit-Baltistan (G-B). The transfer of 44 tourism sites to Green Tourism Limited, a new private company linked to the military and the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), has sparked significant public outcry.
Pak Army-run company takes over govt. hotels and guest houses
Public Outrage and Opposition
Following the agreement between the G-B government and Green Tourism Limited, which includes leasing guest houses, motels, and other sites, local residents have expressed strong opposition. They argue this move will exclude them from the tourism industry, a vital economic sector for the region. Leaders from various political and civil society groups, including the Majlis-e-Wahdatul Muslimeen (MWM) and the Awami Action Committee Gilgit-Baltistan, have voiced their resistance, demanding the decision be reconsidered.
Gilgit-Baltistan Protests Against Controversial Leasing Of Tourism Properties
Key Sites Transferred
The 44 sites include properties like the Baltoro Guest House in Skardu, the PWD Guest House in Chilas, and the Forest Guest House in Chilam. These facilities, previously used by government officials, will now be managed by Green Tourism Limited for the next 30 years. The deal is intended to promote investment, improve facilities, and generate revenue, with 35% of income and 20% annual rent going to the G-B government.
Government’s Stance
Government officials, including spokespersons Eiman Shah and Faiz Ullah Faraq, argue the leases will enable better maintenance and development of these sites, relieving the G-B government of financial burdens. They assure that ownership remains with the G-B government and that the military’s role is limited to support.
Scepticism and Calls for Transparency
Despite these assurances, locals remain sceptical about the transparency of the transfer process and fear a loss of control over their resources. Civil society leaders, like Agha Ali Rizvi and Maisam Kazim, warn of protests if the agreements are not reconsidered. They emphasize that decisions should be made openly, with public input, rather than through secretive agreements.
Potential for Unrest
The situation in G-B echoes the recent unrest in AJK, where failure to address public concerns led to significant upheaval. Without addressing the apprehensions of the G-B populace, the government risks inciting similar unrest, undermining regional stability and economic potential.
Conclusion
The transfer of tourism sites in G-B to Green Tourism Limited has sparked widespread concern and opposition. Addressing these issues transparently and ensuring local involvement in decision-making is crucial to maintaining stability and fostering sustainable growth in the region. The government’s approach will determine whether it can harness G-B’s tourism potential without alienating its people.
May 29,2024
Source: The Friday Times