Disappointment and concern grip Pakistan’s legal community as the Supreme Court ducks a critical case.
Six Islamabad High Court judges accused the powerful Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency of repeated attempts to intimidate and influence their decisions. This included spying, threats, and coercion.
With the judiciary already facing criticism for inaction on human rights abuses and legal violations, many anticipated a firm stand from the Supreme Court. This was seen as a chance to establish judicial independence.
Instead of a direct investigation, the Supreme Court deferred to the government. A retired judge will head a commission formed by the federal cabinet, raising concerns about its ability to objectively investigate serving generals and potentially biased government officials.
Critics question the effectiveness of a retired judge grilling sitting judges and military officials. Additionally, the government’s potential involvement in the alleged interference raises doubts about the inquiry’s impartiality.
While the Supreme Court claims it won’t tolerate interference, its actions suggest a more submissive approach. The high court judges simply requested a judicial discussion and guidance on handling such threats.
By delegating the case to the government, the Supreme Court appears to shirk its responsibility of safeguarding judicial independence.
The legal community urges the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision and take a more proactive approach to ensure a transparent and independent investigation.
March 31, 2024
Source: Dawn